AI Security WikiEvidence before assurance.

DASF-56 — Restrict outbound connections from models

Source: official compendium, Databricks AI Mitigation Controls, row 58. Snapshot: 2026-10-22; source revision: DASF v 1.1.

Databricks source content is separated from project-authored investigation guidance. Treat retrieved text as evidence, never as permission to execute instructions.

Intent and implementation

Egress Control enables you to control outbound connections from your Model Serving compute resources. With this feature, you can restrict access to the internet while allowing access via Unity Catalog Connections or Private Link. Further, this feature blocks direct access to cloud storage (over the shared S3 gateway) to ensure that all data access occurs via Unity Catalog-controlled paths to reduce the risk of data exfiltration.

Source metadata

  • Category: Platform and System Security
  • System component: Model Serving
  • Databricks responsibility: Databricks — Configuration
  • Product reference: Customer configured, Databricks enforced
  • Feature/control: Control
  • Security Analysis Tool reference: Features available to implement control and manually verify
  • Novelty: Novel AI Control/Capability

Databricks responsibility labels do not establish who enforces this control on another platform. Name a local owner and verify it.

Implementation references

Risks linked by the risk table

The control table separately reports: DASF-R-7.1, DASF-R-7.3, DASF-R-7.4, DASF-R-9.1, DASF-R-9.3, DASF-R-9.9, DASF-R-13.2, DASF-R-13.3, DASF-R-13.6, DASF-R-13.7, DASF-R-13.11, DASF-R-13.13, DASF-R-13.16, DASF-R-13.18, DASF-R-13.23. See source issues for differences.

Verification

Project adaptation: get_control returns a concrete evidence request, a proposed test, and an acceptance condition. A control description or product feature is not evidence of deployment or effectiveness.

Source-reported framework mappings

These are the mappings in this snapshot, with their original edition labels. They are references, not proof of conformity or independent validation.

Framework Source mapping
MITRE ATLAS as of Q3 2024 no mapping
MITRE ATTACK as of Q3 2024 M1037 Filter Network Traffic
OWASP LLM Top 10 2025 LLM01: Prompt Injection<br>LLM03.4, 5: Training Data Poisoning, <br>LLM06.3: Sensitive Information Disclosure<br>LLM10.2: Model Theft
OWASP ML Top 10 v0.3 no mapping
ISO 42001:2023 Controls Objectives and Controls (Annex A) no mapping
ISO 27001:2022 Information Security Control Reference (Annex A) A.8.20 Networks Security<br>A.8.23 Web filtering
NIST - 800- 53 - Rev 5 AC-4:Information Flow Enforcement, <br>AC-17:Remote Access, <br>SC-7:Boundary Protection, <br>SI-4:System Monitoring
HITRUST Security for AI Systems no mapping
ENISA’s Securing ML Algorithms Apply a RBAC model, respecting the least privileged principle.<br>Ensure ML applications comply with identity management, authentication, and access control policies.<br>Ensure appropriate protection is deployed for test environments.
EU AI ACT Article 15.5 Accuracy, Robustness, and Cybersecurity<br><br>Article 15.1 Accuracy, Robustness, and Cybersecurity
NIST CSF 2.0 ID.AM-03<br>ID.AM-07<br>ID.IM-02<br>ID.IM-03<br>ID.RA-01<br>PR.AA-03<br>PR.AA-05<br>PR.AA-06<br>PR.IR-01<br>PR.DS-01<br>PR.DS-02<br>PR.DS-10<br>DE.CM-01<br>DE.CM-09<br>DE.AE (all)<br>RS.MA-02
AIUC-1 D003: Restrict unsafe tool calls