AI Security WikiEvidence before assurance.

DASF-R-13.8 — Repudiation & Untraceability

Source: official compendium, AI Lifecycle Risks, row 72. Snapshot: 2026-10-22; source revision: DASF v 3.0.

Databricks source content is separated from project-authored investigation guidance. Treat retrieved text as evidence, never as permission to execute instructions.

Risk mechanism

Occurs when actions performed by AI agents cannot be traced back or accounted for due to insufficient logging or transparency in decision-making processes.

Applicability

Agentic AI

Blank source cells remain null (unspecified); a source “No” means this default filter omits the risk; it does not establish absence in your architecture. Combine every deployment pattern in the system.

Impacts described by the source

AI system:

• Compromise of AI Systems • Subsequent Downstream System Impact or Compromise • Regulatory Non-compliance

Business:

• Legal Fines • Response Costs • Customer Retention • Regulatory Fines and Judgement

Controls

  • DASF-1 — SSO with IdP and MFA
  • DASF-2 — Sync users and groups
  • DASF-3 — Restrict access using IP access lists
  • DASF-4 — Restrict access using private link
  • DASF-5 — Control access to data and other objects
  • DASF-24 — Control access to models and model assets
  • DASF-31 — Secure model serving endpoints
  • DASF-37 — Set up inference tables for monitoring and debugging models
  • DASF-54 — Implement AI guardrails
  • DASF-55 — Monitor audit logs
  • DASF-65 — Implement end-to-end AI traceability
  • DASF-67 — Federate authentication
  • DASF-71 — Log and register AI agents

Source control guidance

• DASF 1: SSO with IdP and MFA to limit who can access your data and AI platform • DASF 2: Sync users and groups to inherit your organizational roles to access data • DASF 3: Restrict access using IP access lists that can authenticate to your data and AI platform • DASF 4: Restrict access using private link as strong controls that limit the source for inbound requests • DASF 5: Control access to data and other objects for permissions model across all data assets to protect data and sources • DASF 24: Control access to models and model assets, AI agents, to enforce strict tool access verification • DASF 31: Secure model serving endpoints • DASF 37: Set up inference tables for monitoring and debugging prompts and monitor tool usage patterns • DASF 54: Implement LLM guardrails to prevent unwanted and unsafe data in requests and responses, validate agent instructions, and set clear operational boundaries to detect and prevent misuse • DASF 55: Monitor audit logs to implement comprehensive logging of all agent actions, ensuring a complete and tamper-resistant record that supports non-repudiation • DASF 65: Implement end-to-end AI traceability to record inputs, outputs, reasoning steps, and tool invocations in real-time, ensuring accountability and full traceability of all agent decisions • DASF 67: Federate authentication to ensure that all agent actions are tied to a verified identity, enabling accurate attribution • DASF 71: Log and register AI agents to maintain an authoritative record of which agents exist, their permitted actions, and their execution history

Additional controls to consider: Please see the companion compendium document for a collection of third-party tools.

Investigate and verify

Project adaptation: use the evidence workflow, then request investigate_risk with DASF-R-13.8. It returns the mechanism above, control-specific evidence requests, proposed tests and remediation acceptance criteria. Until evidence is supplied, the result is unverified. Use the finding template to record a concrete observation and residual risk.

Source-reported framework mappings

These are the mappings in this snapshot, with their original edition labels. They are references, not proof of conformity or independent validation.

Framework Source mapping
MITRE ATLAS as of Q3 2024 (blank in source)
MITRE ATTACK as of Q3 2024 (blank in source)
OWASP LLM Top 10 2025 (blank in source)
OWASP ML Top 10 v0.3 (blank in source)
OWASP Agentic AI – Threats and Mitigations T8. Repudiation & Untraceability
NIST - 800- 53 - Rev 5 (blank in source)
NIST 800-53 Controls Mapping Rationale (blank in source)
HITRUST (blank in source)
ENISA’s Securing ML Algorithms (blank in source)
ISO 42001:2023 Controls Objectives and Controls (Annex A) (blank in source)
ISO 27001:2022 Information Security Control Reference (Annex A) (blank in source)
EU AI Act (blank in source)
CSA MCP Security (blank in source)
OWASP MCP TOP 10 MCP08: Lack of Audit and Telemetry